Natural Remedies click here!    Equine Vets & Caregivers click here!   Spring/Summer Show Preview click here!

Join Our Mailing List!

Sign up to get interesting news
delivered FREE to your inbox.  

Sunday, May 16, 2021
Real Estate Promo Ad

The Weaponization of SafeSport:

SafeSport can be, and has been, weaponized and used against an athlete.

Athletes for EquityAthletes for Equity in Sport did a Case Study of such a weaponization that ruined one person's, and that person is referred to throughout as they or them to prevent any possibility of discovering this person's identity though its sex.

A 2004 Olympic medalist marathon runner, who formally retired from the sport in 2005, became interested in community service.

In 2017, the former athlete channeled their commitment to public service into a bid for a national public office.

With the help of an army of volunteers, the campaign developed a platform and began to gain grass roots support.

The former athlete lived and worked in the community and coached high school track and field.


SCHOOL OFFICIALS and parents praised the athlete and coach as a person of great character, while the young athletes excelled in their track events and were developing in personal self-esteem and maturity.

While the former Olympic athlete gained in popularity and was well supported in their political campaign by the general public, their political opponent became fearful of losing the political contest if public support could not be swayed.

Seeing the creation of SafeSport in 2017 and reading about SafeSport policies, the political opponent decided that there was an opportunity to use SafeSport to cast a shadow on the former Olympic athlete.

A SafeSport report was filed against the former athlete, claiming that while competing at the Olympics, they forced themselves on another athlete sexually.

The political opponent made the SafeSport report public, smearing the spotless reputation and character of the marathon runner.

The local and national newspapers ran the story and the former Olympic athlete was forced to spend time and money getting to the bottom of this unsubstantiated charge.

Although the local district attorney knew nothing of the charges, the police did not have a complaint on record, SafeSport took the report as true prior to investigation, publicly banned the former athlete and placed them on the SafeSport suspension list.

The former Olympic athlete’s political campaign was derailed and they lost their election and coaching position.

The marathon runner fought to clear its name successfully as the accusations could not be proven at even the lowest threshold used by SafeSport which is set at a preponderance of evidence.

While the reversal of the SafeSport ruling was ultimately the correct outcome, it was too little too late.

The marathon runner was defeated in their quest for public office and coaching positions dried up due to continued media scrutiny.

SafeSport had been weaponized and a precedent was set for others seeking to harm perceived opponents.



What are the current statistics regarding SafeSport sanctions that are reversed?

How does SafeSport handle cases in which a Claimant files false allegations against a Respondent or otherwise improperly uses the SafeSport resolution process?

Is it SafeSport’s policy to pursue sanctions in those cases to uphold the integrity of the SafeSport process?

Is it fair to say SafeSport imposed and publicized the sanction prior to sufficiently investigating?

What institutional oversight safeguards and transparency requirements are in place to ensure SafeSport fulfills its mission fairly and competently?

Does Congress actively oversee the case by case resolution process at SafeSport?

Is Congressional oversight alone sufficient to protect the legitimate interests of all parties under SafeSport’s jurisdiction to ensure SafeSport fulfills its responsibilities as Congress intended?



Without sufficient safeguards and oversight, the SafeSport model is too easily weaponized which can severely punish individuals who are unfairly accused.

There must be a more effective process between law enforcement and SafeSport to establish safety protocols regarding claim submission and SafeSport investigations.

More oversight and transparency would inspire confidence in SafeSport among all participants who are under its jurisdiction and would strengthen SafeSport’s ability to fulfill its important mission to protect the safety of athletes.

The Horse of Delaware Valley

Editor: Sara Cavanagh

Advertising Director: Ginny Jenkins

Marketing Manager: Heather Mullen

 Since 1980


Monthly Advertising Themes


  • March
    Spring/Summer Show Previews & Trainers, Barns & Equipment
  • April
    All Natural Products & Services, Spring/Summer Show Previews & Trainers, Barns & Equipment
  • May
    All Natural Products & Services, Equine Vets & Caregivers
  • June
    Equine Vets & Caregivers, Pets & Pet Supplies, Pest Control, & Footing and Fencing
  • July
    Footing & Fencing, Equine Education & Colleges
  • August
    Fall Show Previews & Trainers, Equine Education & Colleges, Equine Insurance, Legal & Accounting
  • September
    Fall Show Previews & Trainers, Equine Artists/Photographers & Galleries, Equine Insurance, Legal, & Accounting
  • October
    Trailers & Equine Transportation, Equine Artists/Photographers & Galleries
  • November
    Holiday Gift Guide, Trailers, Real Estate
  • December
    Stallions/Breeding, Winter Care & Gift Guide
  • January
    Stallions & Breeding, Photo Contest & Winter Care
  • February
    Barns & Equipment, Photo Contest

Click here for more Information.

HODV27 SignUp 200x200

kids corner sidebar promo